It’s been argued that American farms need cheap imported labor to keep food prices low. But in an online debate at the New York Times, UC Davis agricultural economist Philip Martin makes the case that increasing farmworkers’ wages by 40 percent would have an almost negligible effect on your grocery bill.
If farm wages rose 40 percent, and this wage increase were passed on to consumers, average spending on fresh fruits and vegetables would rise about $15 a year, the cost of two movie tickets. However, for a typical seasonal farm worker, a 40 percent wage increase could raise earnings from $10,000 for 1,000 hours of work to $14,000 — lifting the wage above the federal poverty line.
Are visas for foreign technology workers vital to America’s economy, or a way of undermining the salaries of US-born engineers? Five immigration experts, including UC Davis computer science professor Norman Matloff, have been debating the issue on the New York Times immigration blog.
Saturday’s NY Times carried the story of Google engineer Sanjay Mavinkurve, who is currently living in Canada and commuting to Google because under U.S. immigration law, his wife would not be allowed to work if they moved to the U.S..
Matloff is unimpressed: he says that the H-1B visa category is actually a way to bring cheap labor to the tech industry.
Full post: The Great H1 Visa Debate
(218 words, estimated 52 secs reading time)